pISSN 1226-6051
eISSN 2508-786X

Table. 1.

Table. 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study name Study design Sample size Intervention fluids Gender Male (%) median Age (years) Intervention vs Control Diagnosis Disease severity assessment Intervention vs Control MV (%) Intervention vs Control
Wu BU 201142) Randomized controlled study 40 LR 55.0 50(40-73) vs 54(40-60) Acute pancreatitis SIRS: 32% vs 19% BISAP : 0 vs 1 median APACHE II: 3 vs 3 NA
Young P 201544) Double-blind, cluster randomized, double-crossover trial 2,262 PL 148 65.6 60.10(16.79) vs 60.95(16.25) Sepsis, Trauma, Brain Injury, Operative admission (ICU) mean APACHE II: 14.1 vs 14.1 67.0% vs 66.0%
Verma B 201641) Randomized controlled pilot study 67 PL 148 62.7 62(45-70) vs 64(46-72) Sepsis,Trauma, Operative admission (ICU) median APACHE III: 55 vs 64 Vasopressor use: 45.5% vs 32.4% 57.6% vs 55.9%
Semler MW 201739) Cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial 974 LR PL 148 52.8 57(44-68) vs 58(46-70) Sepsis, Pneumonia, Respiratory failure, GI bleeding, Liver failure, Ingestion, Malignancy, DKA, AKI (ICU) Vasopressor use: 21.9 % vs 24.4 % Stage 2 AKI 18.5% vs 19.2% 33.5% vs 34.1 %
Semler MW 201813) Randomized controlled study 15,802 LR PL 148 57.6 58(44-69) vs 58(44-69) Sepsis,Trauma, Brain Injury (ICU) Vasopressor use: 26.4 % vs 26.2 % Stage 2 AKI 8.6% vs 8.2% 34.3% vs 34.7 %
de-Madaria E 201814) Randomized controlled study 40 LR 47.5 61.4(15.5) vs 63.8(19.1) Acute pancreatitis SIRS criteria ≥ 2 47.4 % vs 66.7% NA
Golla R 202040) Open label RCT 160 LR 53.1 43.46(17.99) vs 42.44(19.37) Sepsis (ED) mean SOFA: 7.63 vs 7.64 NA
Jackson KE 202146) Secondary analysis of SMART trial (Semler MW, 2018) 1,641 LR PL 148 54.7 59 (45-69) vs 59 (46-69) Sepsis (ICU) Vasopressor use: 41.9% vs 40.4% Stage 2 AKI 25.1% vs 25.5% 39.3% vs 40.8%
Raghunathan K 201429) Cohort study 6,730 LR Normosol PL 148 48.5 64(53-77) vs 64(52-76) Sepsis (ICU) Renal failure: 20.8 % vs 20.5% 44.7% vs 43.3%
Duffy RA 2019 15) Cohort study 1,218 Normosol 47.7 60.6(18.7)* vs 64.3(18.6)* Sepsis (ED) mean qSOFA: 0.70 vs 0.68 NA
Shaw AD 201545) Cohort study 3,116 Normosol PL 148 42.8 NA SIRS (SIRS criteria) SIRS: 100 % of total population NA
Lipinski M 201516) Cohort study 103 LR 66.0 49.2(18.0) vs 52.5(17.6) Acute pancreatitis BISAP ≥ 3: 20.0% vs 12.7% NA
Aboelsoud MM 201643) Cohort study 198 LR 50.3 63(52-74)* vs 56(44-72)* Acute pancreatitis (ICU) BISAP ≥ 3: 32.3% vs 26.9%* median SAPS-II: 33 vs 35 NA

AKI=acute kidney injury, AP=acute pancreatitis, APACHE=Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, BISAP=Bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis, DKA=diabetic ketoacidosis, ED=emergency department, GI=gastrointestinal, ICU=intensive care unit, LR=Lactated Ringer’s solution, MV=mechanical ventilator, NA=not available, PL 148=Plasma-Lyte 148, SAPS=Simplified Acute Physiology Score, SIRS=systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SOFA=sequential organ failure assessment

*p<0.05 mean (standard deviation)

Korean J Clin Pharm 2022;32:251-9 https://doi.org/10.24304/kjcp.2022.32.3.251
© 2022 Korean J Clin Pharm